Marriage
noun
·
1the formal union of a man and a woman, typically as
recognized by law, by which they become husband and wife:
2a
combination or mixture of elements:her music is a marriage of funk,
jazz, and hip hop
As one of my “30 before 30” goals is to “Buy a house” and to do this with the BF this can often lead to a question being
asked. (Mainly by the over 50’s).
“So, are you two getting married?”
Had I been talking to someone my own age (20-something) then I doubt the question would even be asked! Whether it’s an age thing, a cultural thing or just a personal
thing there still seems to be 2 camps; those that believe in cohabiting and
those that don’t.
Take the comment from one of the guests on a UK daytime TV show this morning when the Olympic flame torch runner proposed to his heavily pregnant girlfriend.. "They can't not be married yet, she's already pregnant?" Errr Hello? It's 2012!
Take the comment from one of the guests on a UK daytime TV show this morning when the Olympic flame torch runner proposed to his heavily pregnant girlfriend.. "They can't not be married yet, she's already pregnant?" Errr Hello? It's 2012!
Coming from a mixed race and fairly religious background my
family have almost all got married before living with their partners. In almost every case this has resulted in divorce somewhere down
the line. Both sets of Grandparents passed away still married to their first
love and whilst I find this wildly romantic is it just that for their
generation it wasn’t an option to separate?
Cohabit
verb (cohabits, cohabiting, cohabited)
[no object]
·
1live together and have a sexual relationship
without being married:an increasing number of couples are cohabiting E.g Mary is
now cohabiting with Paul
Unlike me who has only lived away from home whilst at uni
(living with 2 boys and a girl) many of my friends have lived with their
partners and cohabited. Despite the relationships ending and them going their separate
ways would anything have been different had they been married? Would they have felt obliged to make it work or felt bound to stay unhappy?
Before we think about the legal bit or the many, many
statistics on the topic we should consider the emotional commitment. As the
Oxford dictionary says, a marriage is a legal joining of two people but also a joining
or coming together of two elements. A legal document can only go so far when
someone is said to be your father or mother but it’s the emotional relationship
that tends to be the strongest bond. Can this be applied to sexual relationships? If
you love someone, you want to make a home with them and the feeling is mutual then does that need to be validated by a marriage certificate?
"Researchers found that all couples had a honeymoon period right after they got married or moved in together—they were happier and less depressed than those who stayed single. The study also found that couples who just lived together had bigger leaps in happiness and more self-esteem than they did when they were living alone. Married couples also were happier than before, but didn’t get the same big boost." Read more: Pass This On To Your Pushy Mother - Cohabitation Happiness Study - Cosmopolitan
The "try before you buy" theory suggests people may want a get out clause should there be trouble in paradise or is it just a way to ensure you make the most of the fun stage before settling down and getting serious?
For some, is a public declaration of love a true test of someone's feelings and a way to document that you want the same things? Coming from a traditional(ish) family I have seen how marriage can be both fabulous and destructive; sacred and irrelevant.
Kim Kardashian and Britney Spears are the queens of publicity stunt marriages with theirs lasting little more than a yoghurt would in the fridge but are the regular folk capable of the false gesture only to have to admit our mistake or change our minds?
In the Uk it’s recorded that there are approx. “ four million couples
living together in England and Wales in cohabitation” http://www.direct.gov.uk/en/governmentcitizensandrights/yourrightsandresponsibilities/dg_10026937
Considering this and the current Uk divorce rate which has
been growing again since the recession, couples may wonder if more and more people are trying to secure their relationship by not getting hitched?
 |
| Love and Sex |
It’s not a new idea that marriage changes a relationship and
film and TV have dramatised and inflated the issues as seen in “Barefoot in the
park”, “Love and Sex” and the light hearted but somewhat realistic ending in “Bride
wars” where only one couple ties the knot and the other breaks up. Had that
couple not been faced with an ultimatum of declaring their love in front of
friends and family would they have continued in cohabiting bliss?
As we grow up must I give up on the idea that "one day my prince will come" and present me with a diamond as proof of their undying love?
Research into this topic brings up more results about the legal reasons for and against marriage then any of the emotional ties. In Norway the rights for a cohabiting couple are very similar to their married neighbors but in the Uk it is not the case.
Many people think that, after living with their partner for a few years, they become 'common law husband and wife' with the same rights as married couples. This is not the case. In fact, couples who live together have hardly any of the same rights as married couples or civil partners. There is no such thing as ‘common law marriage’.
As the divorce rate increases again the danger is that should a couple part ways you could end up losing your home if your partner legally owns it outright; regardless of how long you have lived together. Whilst this is something to consider, should it ever be as important as whether that person is the one you want to spend forever with or has naive romanticism died a rather unromantic death?
Would you go with your heart, your head or your wallet?
